You’re all signed up for Legal Slice
Thank you for your interest in our service.
Watch out for a confirmation email from our subscriptions team. Once you have confirmed you will join the worldwide community of thousands of subscribers who are receiving daily legal intelligence to lead, innovate and grow.
Note: Due to the nature of this message you may find this in your "promotions" or "spam" folders, please check there. If nothing arrives within a few minutes let us know. If you do not receive this email we will be happy to help get you set up.
Adding the email address news@industryslice.com, will help to ensure all newsletters arrive directly to your inbox.
Recent Editions

Legal Slice
A federal appeals court has upheld a New Jersey law prohibiting firearms in sensitive locations such as schools and public gatherings. The 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals, in a detailed 139-page opinion, highlighted the historical precedent for restricting firearms in specific civic areas, observing: “a pattern emerges: our Nation has permitted restriction of firearms in discrete locations set aside for particular civic functions.” New Jersey Attorney General Matt Platkin praised the ruling as a “decisive victory” for public safety. However, Pete Patterson, representing gun rights supporters, expressed disappointment and noted they would consider their next steps. The court's decision aligns with similar rulings in other states following the U.S. Supreme Court's 2022 expansion of gun rights. While the court upheld the sensitive place restrictions, it maintained a lower court's ruling against an insurance mandate for gun carriers.
Full Issue