You’re all signed up for the Education Slice
Thank you for your interest in our service.
Watch out for a confirmation email from our subscriptions team. Once you have confirmed you will join the community of over 35,000 subscribers who are receiving daily Education intelligence to lead, innovate and grow.
Note: Due to the nature of this message you may find this in your "promotions" or "spam" folders, please check there. If nothing arrives within a few minutes let us know. If you do not receive this email we will be happy to help get you set up.
Adding the email address news@industryslice..com, will help to ensure all newsletters arrive directly to your inbox.
Recent Editions
Education Slice
National
Attorneys general from 17 Democratic-leaning states have filed a lawsuit challenging a Trump administration policy requiring colleges and universities to submit detailed admissions data, including applicants’ race, gender, test scores, and grade point averages. The administration says the requirement is intended to ensure institutions comply with the 2023 U.S. Supreme Court ruling restricting race-conscious admissions. Education Secretary Linda McMahon has argued the data collection will increase transparency and help determine whether universities are still using racial preferences in admissions decisions. However, the states claim the mandate was implemented too quickly and imposes a significant administrative burden on colleges, requiring them to compile seven years of admissions data, much of which institutions may not have readily available. The lawsuit also argues the policy could politicize the National Center for Education Statistics, a traditionally nonpartisan agency, by turning it into a tool for enforcing political objectives. Critics say schools are being forced to spend significant time and resources gathering data that may ultimately have limited practical value, while the administration maintains that taxpayers deserve greater transparency about how universities handle admissions following the Supreme Court decision.
Full Issue
Education Slice
California
Schools are increasingly concerned about potential funding disruptions despite Congress's recent approval of a federal budget without major education cuts. The Trump administration is revising grant rules to limit prioritization of racial equity and support for undocumented immigrants, which may complicate access to federal funds. Catherine Pozniak, a school finance consultant, remarked: "The theme here for me is: [The Trump administration] got stopped in one way, and this is another way they're trying to do it." The administration's past actions have already disrupted over $12bn in federal education funds, leading to delays and cancellations of grants. As the administration continues to implement its political priorities through grantmaking, many school districts are left uncertain about their funding future and are preparing for potential financial shortfalls.
Full Issue
Education Slice
Texas
The Trump administration's visa changes are significantly impacting rural school districts, which rely heavily on international teachers to address staffing shortages. The new $100,000 fee on H-1B visas, aimed at reducing foreign worker employment, has raised fears among educators and administrators about losing valuable staff. With over 2,300 H-1B visa holders working in education across 500 districts, the National Education Association noted that these changes could hinder hiring efforts. As rural districts struggle to attract local teachers due to lower salaries and limited resources, many are considering alternatives like online instruction or hiring uncertified teachers.
Full Issue
Education Slice
Florida
The Florida Legislature has passed SB 1296, a controversial bill that labor advocates argue could severely undermine public sector unions. Despite significant bipartisan opposition, hundreds of public workers, including teachers and police officers, rallied against the measure. The bill, which now awaits Gov. Ron DeSantis's signature, alters union certification elections, requiring at least 50% of public employees in a bargaining unit to participate. House Democratic Leader Fentrice Driskell said: "We should be strengthening the ability of public employees to use their voice, not constructing a system designed to silence it." The bill's sponsor, Rep. Jenna Persons-Mulicka, contends that the right to collectively bargain belongs to public employees, not unions. Concerns have been raised regarding potential violations of free speech and collective bargaining rights, particularly for public safety employees.
Full Issue