You’re all signed up for Accountancy Slice
Thank you for your interest in our service.
Watch out for a confirmation email from our subscriptions team. Once you have confirmed you will join the worldwide community of thousands of subscribers who are receiving daily Accountancy intelligence to lead, innovate and grow.
Note: Due to the nature of this message you may find this in your "promotions" or "spam" folders, please check there. If nothing arrives within a few minutes let us know. If you do not receive this email we will be happy to help get you set up.
Adding the email address news@industryslice.com, will help to ensure all newsletters arrive directly to your inbox.
Recent Editions
Accountancy Slice
North America
Top Senate Democrats are demanding answers from Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and IRS chief executive Frank Bisignano over a controversial settlement between President Donald Trump and the IRS that created a $1.776bn “Anti-Weaponization Fund” for individuals claiming they were improperly targeted under the Biden administration. In a letter sent by Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and Ron Wyden (D-OR), the lawmakers criticized the agreement as potentially corrupt and raised concerns that the fund could benefit Trump allies or individuals connected to the January 6th Capitol attack. They also questioned provisions that appear to shield Mr. Trump, his family, and affiliated businesses from certain ongoing or potential IRS audits and investigations. The settlement stems from Trump’s $10bn lawsuit against the IRS after a former government contractor pleaded guilty to leaking confidential tax records of Trump and other wealthy individuals. “This is an unprecedented remedy,” said former IRS Commissioner Daniel Werfel. “People expect the same tax rules and enforcement framework to apply to everybody.” “The president and his affiliates might not pay the taxes they should,” added Brandon DeBot, policy director at New York University’s Tax Law Center. “This is giving the president and his affiliates completely different set of rules than everyday taxpayers.”
Full Issue