You’re all signed up for CFO Slice
Thank you for your interest in our service.
Watch out for a confirmation email from our subscriptions team. Once you have confirmed you will join the worldwide community of thousands of subscribers who are receiving daily CFO intelligence to lead, innovate and grow.
Note: Due to the nature of this message you may find this in your "promotions" or "spam" folders, please check there. If nothing arrives within a few minutes let us know. If you do not receive this email we will be happy to help get you set up.
Adding the email address news@industryslice.com, will help to ensure all newsletters arrive directly to your inbox.
Recent Editions
CFO Slice
Major U.S. public pension funds and business groups have taken opposing positions on the SEC’s proposal to rescind its climate risk disclosure rule, highlighting a growing divide over corporate climate reporting. Pension funds including CalPERS, CalSTRS, and the New York State Common Retirement Fund argued that eliminating the rule would leave investors with inconsistent, more expensive, and less reliable climate data, while business groups such as the Business Roundtable and the American Petroleum Institute said rescinding the rule would reduce unnecessary compliance costs and focus disclosures on financially material information. Large asset managers adopted more nuanced positions. Vanguard supported avoiding overly burdensome reporting requirements but said standardized disclosure of material climate risks helps investors make better-informed decisions. The debate comes as several states move ahead with their own climate reporting rules, potentially creating a patchwork of requirements.
Full Issue