Experts urge simpler, age-appropriate lockdown drills |
School safety experts and research distinguish routine lockdown drills from more intense active shooter simulations, despite the terms often being used interchangeably. Lockdown drills generally involve locking doors, turning off lights, and moving out of sight, while active shooter simulations can include actors, simulated gunfire, fake blood, and nonlethal projectiles. In a piece for The Conversation Emily Greene-Colozzi, assistant professor of criminology and justice studies at UMass Lowell cites studies that suggest lockdown drills may improve preparedness, reduce fear, and potentially limit casualties. She also notes that evidence on high-intensity simulations is mixed, and that concerns remain about psychological harm. Experts recommend age-appropriate, neutral approaches, particularly for younger children, but inconsistent terminology, policies, and practices across states make it difficult to assess the overall benefits and risks of school preparedness drills.