Meta faces landmark federal child safety trial |
Meta is facing the first bellwether federal trial over allegations that Instagram and Facebook have harmed children through addictive product features, with California, Colorado, Kentucky, and New Jersey seeking nearly $200bn in damages for alleged violations of federal child privacy and state consumer protection laws. The states argue that Meta knew features such as infinite scroll, beauty filters, and engagement-driven algorithms could contribute to compulsive use, anxiety, and other harms among young users, while continuing to promote its platforms as safe. Meta denies the claims, says it has introduced safeguards for teenagers, and argues that the states’ allegations are unsubstantiated and their financial demands disproportionate. The six-to-eight-week Oakland trial represents a significant legal test for Meta after recent setbacks, including a $6m California verdict against Meta and YouTube and a New Mexico ruling ordering Meta to pay nearly $1bn. Meta said it spent more than $2bn legal expenses related to social media addiction trials and other litigation from April through June, compared with quarterly profit of $18bn. Beyond damages, the four states are seeking changes to Meta’s products for users under 18, including bans on infinite scrolling, autoplay, “like” buttons, certain beauty filters, and engagement-optimized algorithms.